简介: 【摘 要】目的:探讨牙周炎患者正畸过程中采用牙周序列治疗方式的有效性。方法:随机选取我院于 2017年 7月至 2019年 7月接受正畸治疗的 80例牙周炎患者,并将其分为对照组( n=40)及研究组( n=40),其中给予对照组患者单纯正畸治疗,而研究组则在前者基础上联合牙周序列治疗,对两组临床疗效进行评价比较。结果:与对照组相比,研究组患者治疗后 PD(探诊深度)、 PLI(菌斑指数)、 BI(出血指数)、 CAL(临床牙周附着丧失)等指标水平更理想,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05) ;研究组治疗总有效率为 95.00%,明显高于对照组 70.00%,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:牙周炎患者正畸过程中采用牙周序列治疗,具有积极意义,可在提高患者临床疗效的同时,改善患者的牙周健康指标。 【关键词】牙周炎 ;正畸 ;牙周序列 ;治疗 Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of sequential periodontal therapy in the orthodontic treatment of periodontitis. Methods: 80 patients with periodontitis who received orthodontic treatment in our hospital from July 2017 to July 2019 were randomly selected and divided into control group (n = 40) and study group (n = 40). Patients in control group were given orthodontic treatment only, while patients in study group were treated with periodontal sequential therapy on the basis of the former. Results: compared with the control group, Pd (probing depth), PLI (plaque index), Bi (bleeding index), cal (clinical periodontal attachment loss) and other indicators of the study group were more ideal after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the total effective rate of the study group was 95.00%, significantly higher than that of the control group 70.00%, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: it is of positive significance to use periodontal sequence therapy in the orthodontic treatment of patients with periodontitis, which can improve the clinical efficacy and periodontal health indicators of patients.
简介: [摘要 ]目的:探讨在全科中实施以人为本健康教育的价值。方法:择取在 2017年 11月 -2019年 11月在我院收治的 106例住院患者,随机划分为甲组( n=53)、乙组( n=53),甲组行常规健康教育,乙组予以以人为本的健康教育,分析 2组护理满意度以及健康知识认知度。结果:干预后,同甲组进行比较,乙组对健康知识的了解程度更高( p<0.05) ;乙组对健康教育内容的满意度更高( p<0.05)。结论:在全科护理中,采取以人为本的健康教育,能够有效增加患者对健康知识的了解,将满意度和护理效果予以提升,临床应用价值较高。 [关键词 ]健康教育,全科护理,以人为本,满意度 [Abstract] Objective: To explore the value of people-oriented health education in general practice. Methods: 106 inpatients in our hospital from November 2017 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into group A (n = 53) and group B (n = 53). Group a received routine health education, while group B received people-oriented health education. Nursing satisfaction and awareness of health knowledge of the two groups were analyzed. Results: after the intervention, compared with group A, group B had a higher degree of understanding of health knowledge (P < 0.05), and group B had higher satisfaction with the content of health education (P < 0.05). Conclusion: in general nursing, taking people-oriented health education can effectively increase the patients' understanding of health knowledge, improve the satisfaction and nursing effect, and have higher clinical application value.