论《傲慢与偏见》中反映的爱情婚姻观

论《傲慢与偏见》中反映的爱情婚姻观

赵芯羽

赵芯羽陕西工运学院

【摘要】奥斯丁在《傲慢与偏见》中描述了男女的四种婚姻类型。她强调了经济状况对妇女爱情和婚姻的束缚，建立在爱情基础上的婚姻才是理想和幸福的。本文通过对《傲慢与偏见》中两类男女婚姻的分析，来阐明作品中所反映的奥斯丁的婚姻观是前卫的，她提倡的是一种爱情与经济并重而又以爱情为重的婚姻观，还强调了男女之间的平等。

【关键词】傲慢与偏见婚姻观经济考虑

【中图分类号】I106.4【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1674－4810（2010）06－0023－02

【Abstract】InPrideandPrejudice,Austenwrotefourmarriagetypes.Shepointedout

emphaticallyeconomicconsiderationisthebondsofwedlockandlove.Shesaidthemarriagesettledbyloveishappyandideal.AnalyzeonthetwomarriagetypesinPrideandPrejudice,thethesisexplicatedthatAusten’sviewofmarriagewasprogressive,advocatedbyherfocusontheequalitybetweenmenandwomen.Sheemphasizedmarriageshouldbeofequalimportancebothbyloveandbyeconomicconsiderationbutloveplaystheguidingrole.

【Keywords】PrideandPrejudiceViewsofmarriageEconomicconsideration

1．ChapterOne:anAnalysisofPrideandPrejudice

TheSocialBackgroundoftheNovel：

PrideandPrejudice,agentlebutwittysatireofcourtshipandmarriage,iscertainlyJaneAusten’smostpopularnovel,andhasalwaysbeenafavoriteworkstoreaders,justasitwasafavoriteofJaneAustenherself.ThebackgroundofPrideandPrejudiceisthetimeoftheRegencyinBritain.Attheendofthe18thcenturyandthebeginningofthe19thcentury,BritainwasattheperiodoftransitionfromtheearlierstageofCapitalismtoCapitalistIndustrialization.Thesocietywasdevelopingratherslowlynotonlyinpoliticsbutalsoineconomycomparedwiththedevelopedcapitalisticsocietyofthemiddle19thcentury.Atthattimewomen’seducationandemploymentwereimpossible.Women’spositionwasdeterminedbythesocialeconomicdevelopmentatthattime.Therefore,womenofthe“genteel”classinAusten’snovelswerecharacterizedbythefeaturesofthaterawhentheywerehandlingtheirloveaffairsormaritalproblems.

Allthehistoricalbackgroundsmustbetakenintoconsiderationwhenthereadersappreciatethenovel.OnlyinthiswaycanweobtainaproperevaluationofAusten’sviewofmarriage.

2．ChapterTwo:anAnalysisoftheTwoThemesofLove

（1）Elizabeth’sMarriage:WithBothLoveandMoney

Itisthelongcourseoffrictionanddisputesthatprovidechancesforthemtobetterunderstandeachother.Thetwopersonsdonothavegoodfirstimpressiononeachother.Misunderstandingandprejudicearealwaysinvolvedintheirrelation.Buttheystarttoknowmoreabouteachotherlaterandloveeachotherfinally.Asanordinarywomanofthe“genteel”class,Elizabethmaynothavemanybrilliantandprofoundthoughts.However,shepossessessomequalitiesthatarequitedifferentfromotherordinarygirls’.FacingthearrogantDareyandthesnobbishMissBingley,shedoesnotshowanyinferioritybecauseofherownfamilybackground.Instead,shealwaysgivesthemtitfortatinspeechandactioninordertodefendherdignity.Whatismore,Elizabethdaredowhatotherwomenofthesameclassdarenot.Itisobviousthatherspiritbasedonthefullunderstandingofherselfisagainsttheconventionalconceptoffamilystatusinmarriageandfortheequalitybetweenthemaleandthefemale.Nowonderthatsheistreatedastheprotagonistofthenovel.Shehopesthathermarriagecanbebasedonloveandthatthecouplewillhavespiritualagreement.Suchkindofspiritwasveryrareatthattime.AlthoughElizabeth’sconceptofequalityinthefamilyisquitedifferentfromthatofthepresent,itwillnotaffectourfulladmirationofAusten’sspiritagainstthefeudalhierarchyandtheinequalitybetweenmenandwomen.

WhenshevisitsDarcy’shouse,shehearsthehousekeepersay:“Heisthebestlandlord,andthebestmaster..Somepeoplecallhimproud;butIamsureIneversawanythingofit.Tomyfancy,itisonlybecausehedoesnotrattleawaylikeotheryoungmen.”Thenshebeginsknowingshehasmisunderstoodhimandherprejudicebecomelessandless,ontheotherhandshebecomestolikehim.Throughtheseveralmeetings,theiropinionsabouteachotherchangegreatly.Elizabethgraduallyreducesherprejudiceagainst

DarcyandhasaclearerandclearerpictureaboutDarcy’struecharacter.

AndDarcymakescompromisefinallybecauseoflove.HeevendoesnotmindElizabeth’sfamilyclass.Becauseitisreallyhistruelove.

DarcyandElizabethhavesomethingincommonintheirpersonalitythatenablesthemtounderstandeachotherandstaywitheachother.Theyarebothhonestpersons.Inaddition,bothDarcyandElizabethlovetheirfamiliesandsisters.Darcy’slovetowardhissisterisasdeepasthatofElizabeth’stowardJane.AllthesemakeElizabethmuchmorerespectandloveDarcy.Meanwhile,DarcyisattractedbyElizabeth’skindness,intelligence,andhonesty.

Thereisaproverb:amanmusteatapeckofsaltwithhisfriendbeforeheknowshim.TherelationbetweenElizabethandDarcyisjustlikethis.Theyeliminatethemisunderstandinganddeepenthemutualloveandrespectaftermanytwistsandturns.Inconclusion:thecombinationofDarcyandElizabethisa（VirginiaWoolf,onNovelsandNovelists,P55）successfulandhappyone.Therearedeeploveandthoroughunderstandingbetweenthem.

（2）CharlotteLucas’sMarriage:WithMoneyButWithoutLove

CharlotteLucasisquitedifferentfromherbestfriendElizabeth.Wecannothelpfeelingpityforherwhenitcomestohermarriage.CharlotteperceivesMr.Collins’pedantryandsycophancyandstupiditywhentheyfirstmeet.Whensheacceptshisproposal,sheisquiteclearthatMr.Collins,tobesure,wasneithersensiblenoragreeable;hissocietywasirksome,andhisattachmenttohermustbeimaginary.Butstillhewouldbeherhusband.Withoutthinkinghighlyeitherofmanorofmatrimony,marriagehadalwaysbeenherobject.

However,Charlotte’spitifulfateisnotcausedbyherself.First,thedevelopmentofsocialeconomyandherownsocialstatusdeterminethatshehasnootherchoicebuttodependonherhusbandtoensurefoodandclothingforthesecondhalfofherlife.SecondimportantfactisthatMissLucasisattheageoftwenty－seven,withouthavingeverbeenbeautiful.

Asweallknow,quitealotofmarriageshaveindissolublebondswithbeautifulorhandsomeappearances.Inthosefamousworks,wecaneasilyfindthataperfectmatchbetweenahandsomemanandabeautifulwomanisallthetimeanindispensablepartofthelovestory.Inspiteofitsconventionalpattern,wehavetoacknowledgethatthisispeople’sconsistentviewonthemaritalproblems.ThemostobviousattractivenessofElizabethisherbeauty、cleverness,andeleganceaswell;whileCharlottehasnolackofintelligence,itisapitythatsheisnotbeautitulenoughtowintherichman’sheart.ThatthecharacterofCharlottehasanimportantsocialmeaningcannotbeignored.Astohermarriage,shehasnoalternativebuttoacceptMr.Collins’proposalandshehasaclearideaabouttheannoyingsocialreality.ThedescriptionofCharlotteisinfactareflectionofAusten’sviewofwomen’ssocialpositionandherdeepunderstandingofhowmuchfreedomwomenhaveinmarriage.Charlotte’sdecisionabouthermarriageisindeedbasedonthefullunderstandingofherselfandthesociety.Herchoiceiscertainlynotthebestoneandherlifeaftermarriagecannotbereallyhappy,butAustentellsuswithartisticcharminhernovelthatCharlottehastomakethischoicealthoughshefeelsconstrainedtoactagainstherownwill.Thesocialenvironmenttowhichshebelongsmakesitimpossibleforhertochooseherfuturelifeandtodecideherownmarriagefreely.

3．ChapterThree:Conclusion

PrideandPrejudicefullyshowsJaneAusten’sprofoundopinionofmoney,marriageandtheirrelationinawittyandhumorousway.Theauthorcloselylinksthetwothemesmoneyandmarriageandshowsthatamarriagewithoutloveissad,amarriagewithoutmoneyisimpossibleandamarriage,whichisnottheresultofthelovebutinwantoftheeconomy,isunhappyanddespicable.

WhatAusten’snovelsexhibitisaworldwhichisreducedconsumedly;theviewsofthemarenarrow;anyway,theyarequiteconcentrated.Whatshefocusedonwasmoralityandcustoms;strictrulesofbehaviorandcriterion,hence,whathernovelstalkaboutistraditionalmarriages.Shepaidmoreattentiontotheexpatiationthatmarriagemeansprescriptiveconnectionoffortune,decisionofcognationandrightsofsuccession.Austenrepinedforthewomenofthetime;shethoughtwomenwerebornwiththeequalintelligenceandsenseasmen.

Austen’spositionandtheimportanceofherworkscannotbeneglectedinthehistoryofEnglishliteratruenomatterhowlimitedherlifecircleisandnomatterhowtrivialhersubjectmatteris.VirginiaWoolfwroteofAusten,as“amistressofmuchdeeperemotionthanappearsuponthesurface.Shestimulatesustoprovidewhatisnotthere.Whatsheoffersis,apparentlyatrifle,yetiscomposedofsomethingthatexpendsinthereader’smindandendowswiththeenduringformoflifesceneswhichareoutwardlytrivial.”

Allinall,thematrimonialvaluesinPrideandPrejudicearethegreatestcontributionstothewoman’sliteratureandstillhaveinstructionalfunctionstoday.

References

［1］简·奥斯丁.傲慢与偏见［M］.北京：外语教学与研究出社，1996

［2］朱虹.奥斯丁研究［M］.北京：中国文联出版公司，1985

［3］管先恒.《傲慢与偏见》中的婚姻面面观［J］.合肥联合大学学报，2001.12（4）

［4］AnnetteT.RubinStein,theGreatTraditioninEnglishLiterature

［M］.TheUnitedStates:FirstModernReaderPaperbackEdition,1969

［5］吴景蓉.论奥斯丁和她的小说［M］.南宁：漓江出版社，1982

［6］李慧.浅析简·奥斯丁的婚姻观.南阳师范学院学报［J］，2003（10）：69～71

［7］EdwardCopelandandMcmasterJulict,theCambridgeCompaniontoJaneAusten,P145

［8］JaneAustenandCo.SuzanneRRucci,JamesThompson